🔗 Share this article

Per a recent analysis, numerous of individuals with experience in the petroleum field have been positioned within the current government, including more than 40 who formerly worked straight for oil companies.

Overview of the Study

The study investigated the backgrounds of candidates and appointees serving in the administration and multiple government offices responsible for energy regulation. Those cover important entities such as the Environmental Protection Agency, the Interior Department, and the Energy Department.

Larger Policy Climate

The analysis surfaces while persistent initiatives to dismantle environmental rules and clean energy supports. For example, recent acts have opened vast areas of federal territory for mining and eliminated support for sustainable energy.

Amid the firehose of terrible things that have transpired on the environment front... it’s crucial to inform the citizens that these aren’t just measures from the amorphous, ginormous thing that is the government broadly, stated a researcher engaged in the report. It is often specific players with ties to certain wealthy groups that are implementing this disastrous deregulatory program.

Key Findings

Analysts discovered 111 staff whom they considered as energy sector veterans and alternative energy adversaries. That encompasses 43 officials who were directly employed by oil firms. Included in them are high-profile leading executives such as the top energy official, who formerly worked as top executive of a fracking company.

The group also features less prominent government personnel. For example, the department handling renewable energy is managed by a previous oil manager. In the same vein, a senior regulatory counsel in the White House has served in senior jobs at large energy corporations.

Other Ties

An additional 12 appointees were found to have connections to energy-financed rightwing policy organizations. Those include former employees and researchers of groups that have strongly opposed renewable energy and advocated the continuation of traditional energy.

A total of 29 additional officials are former corporate managers from manufacturing industries whose business interests are directly connected to oil and gas. Additional officials have associations with utility providers that distribute fossil fuels or government officials who have advocated pro-coal initiatives.

Departmental Concentration

Researchers discovered that 32 personnel at the interior agency by themselves have links to polluting energy, establishing it as the most influenced government department. This encompasses the secretary of the department, who has long taken energy donations and functioned as a link between fossil fuel business contributors and the campaign.

Political Finance

Fossil fuel contributors contributed significant resources to the campaign effort and ceremony. Since taking office, the government has not only enacted energy-sector regulations but also crafted incentives and tariff carveouts that advantage the sector.

Experience Concerns

Besides oil-tied candidates, the analysts noted multiple government higher-ups who were appointed to powerful roles with minimal or no subject matter experience.

Those people may not be tied to the energy sector so explicitly, but their inexperience is problematic, said one co-author. It’s plausible to think they will be easily influenced, or vulnerable targets, for the oil industry’s agenda.

For instance, the candidate to lead the Environmental Protection Agency’s department of general counsel has limited legal background, having never argued a case to resolution, nor conducted a sworn statement, and nor argued a legal request.

During a separate case, a executive assistant focusing on regulatory issues came to the role after serving in positions unrelated to the industry, with no apparent specific energy industry or administrative expertise.

Administration Response

One spokesperson for the executive branch criticized the report, commenting that the leadership’s appointees are exceptionally competent to implement on the public’s directive to boost domestic resource output.

Historical and Current Backdrop

This administration oversaw a substantial series of anti-environmental actions during its previous tenure. During its present tenure, backed with pro-business plans, it has overseen a much broader and stricter rollback on ecological rules and clean power.

There is no shame, said a analyst. The administration is eager and willing to go out there and promote the fact that they are doing favors for the energy sector, resource industry, the coal industry.